Forum:Power as an Archetype?
| Forums: | Index → General Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion → Power as an Archetype? Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 4947 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but Jack Atlas uses a group of cards in the anime that all have "Power" at the start of their names; the Invader, Supplier, Breaker and Giant have been seen so far. I was wondering why this group of cards is not being treated as an Archetype on this wiki; is there some criteria that I don't know about?
With just four monsters, the group is already larger than some established Archetypes and as far as I can tell they all share a family name. They also have a similarity to most other Archetypes in that a duelist from the anime (Jack) uses them regularly. Would it be possible to get them their own Archetype page in the near future, or is there something I just can't see? --KaseiWagesWar 04:07, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- In addition, the cards Key Mouse, Lock Cat, Chain Dog and the new TCG Exclusive Droll & Lock Bird all seem to belong to an Archetypal family of monsters. They all run very well together, and have names and card images that match up with one another. I'm also putting them up for consideration.--KaseiWagesWar 04:31, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
It could be a contender...BassNettoHikari2...Chat Page... 05:01, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
That's good and all, but to be a contender is never good enough in my eyes. --KaseiWagesWar 17:23, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
I think of Power as a type of strategy, not an archetype so let's just leave that there. Fallensilence (talk • contribs) 23:17, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Well Roses are now considered an Archetype...BassNettoHikari2...Chat Page... 05:04, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- That's because the card "Rose Lover" supports cards with Rose 「ローズ」 in their names. About the Power group, it's just like Yusei's Warriors. So, yes, it can be treated as a non-supported Archetype, like the Monarchs. --Missign0 (talk • contribs) 06:59, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
Hm............archetypes can be so interesting sometimes. Fallensilence (talk • contribs) 02:27, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
Alright, if there's no further problems, I'll make a page later today for these guys.--KaseiWagesWar 16:20, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
